Is There Life on Mars?

Lianne Benning is the sole UK member of the AMASE team studying rocks, ice and micro-organisms on the arctic island of Svalbard in Norway, which has a geology similar to that of parts of Mars. “We sampled the ice-filled volcanic tubes of the one million-year-old Sverrefjell volcano to see if life could survive in such harsh environments,” she said.

Using a life-detection strategy including specially designed sterile drills to avoid contamination from surface bacteria or humans, the team discovered a rare and complex microbial community living deep within blue ice in the arctic volcano. The team detected both living and fossilised organisms, supporting the theory that the frozen planet Mars could sustain life and demonstrating we have tools to find it.

“By taking our science to the earth equivalent of Martian environments, we’re developing sampling and analysis strategies that put us in a good position for future Mars missions,” Dr Benning said. One of their biggest challenges is to develop techniques and instrumentation which can be used by rovers or even astronauts in cumbersome space suits. “We need to be able to take and integrate measurements, from a detailed photo or a simple pH measurement to complex tests detecting single cells,” she said.

To continue this work the AMASE (Astrophysics Multi-spectral Archive Search Engine) team has been awarded a prestigious three-year NASA grant to integrate and test a remote-controlled rover equipped with more complex instruments planned for the NASA Mars science laboratory mission in 2011.

SOURCE: AlphaGalileo

2 thoughts on “Is There Life on Mars?”

  1. I contend the origin of life on Earth came from bacteria carried here, several billion years ago, on a probe from Mars. Since then, the climate on Mars has worsened (global warming gone awry) to the point where no life can be supported and all traces of the once thriving civilization have vanished.

    It’s funny, laugh.

  2. I have seen reports that the current conservative administration of Mars has claimed that environmentalists have blown their claims of global cooling out of all proportion, and that there is no evidence that Martian activities have caused the problem. Increased spending to halt the cooling will hurt the dwindling Martian economy and anyway, there will probably be many economic benefits from such cooling in the future (such as increased usable land surface, fewer and less severe hurricanes, etc.). Administration officials are unconcerned about any possibility of any runaway icehouse effect.

    telescopeguy

Comments are closed.