A group of astronomers, led by Hal McAlister, director of Georgia State University’s Center for High Angular Resolution Astronomy, have used the center’s array of telescopes to detect for the first time Regulus’ rotationally induced distortions. Scientists have measured the size and shape of the star, the temperature difference between its polar and equatorial regions, and the orientation of its spin axis. The researchers’ observations of Regulus represent the first scientific output from the CHARA array, which became routinely operational in early 2004.
According to McAlister, the darkening occurs because Regulus is colder at its equator than at its poles. Regulus’ equatorial bulge diminishes the pull of gravity at the equator, which causes the temperature there to decrease. CHARA researchers have found that the temperature at Regulus’ poles is 15,100 degrees Celsius, while the equator’s temperature is only 10,000 Celsius. The temperature variation causes the star to be about five times brighter at its poles than at its equator. Regulus’ surface is so hot that the star is actually nearly 350 times more luminous than the sun.
CHARA researchers discovered another oddity when they determined the orientation of the star’s spin axis, says McAlister.
“We’re looking at the star essentially equator-on, and the spin axis is tilted about 86 degrees from the north direction in the sky,” he says. “But, curiously enough, the star is moving through space in the same direction its pole is pointing. Regulus is moving like an enormous spinning bullet through space. We have no idea why this is the case.”
Astronomers viewed Regulus using CHARA’s telescopes for six weeks last spring to obtain interferometric data that, combined with spectroscopic measurements and theoretical models, created a picture of the star that reveals the effects of its incredibly fast spin. The results will be published this spring in The Astrophysical Journal.
The CHARA array, located atop Mt. Wilson in southern California, is among a handful of new “super” instruments composed of multiple telescopes optically linked to function as a single telescope of enormous size. The array consists of six telescopes, each containing a light-collecting mirror one meter in diameter. The telescopes are arranged in the shape of a “Y,” with the outermost telescopes located about 200 meters from the center of the array.
A precise combination of the light from the individual telescopes allows the CHARA array to behave as if it were a single telescope with a mirror 330 meters across. The array can’t show very faint objects detected by telescopes such as the giant 10-meter Keck telescopes in Hawaii, but scientists can see details in brighter objects nearly 100 times sharper than those obtainable using the Keck array. Working at infrared wavelengths, the CHARA array can see details as small as 0.0005 arcseconds. (One arcsecond is 1/3,600 of a degree, equivalent to the angular size of a dime seen from a distance of 2.3 miles.) In addition to Georgia State researchers, the CHARA team includes collaborators from the National Optical Astronomy Observatories in Tucson, Ariz., and NASA’s Michelson Science Center at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena.
The CHARA array was constructed with funding from the National Science Foundation, Georgia State, the W. M. Keck Foundation, and the David and Lucile Packard Foundation. The NSF also has awarded funds for ongoing research at the CHARA array.
Text for this article comes from a UGA press release.
Sure, the picture looks egg-shaped at first glance, but since it’s equatorial bulging (NOT polar bulging), the shape is actually more like… um, a hamburger? A cha siu bau maybe?
(geez, I can tell it’s lunchtime…)
C’mon, it’s egg shaped. Which axis is rotating has nothing to do with observer viewpoint. A hamburger is circular from a certain viewpoint. So is an egg, and so is this star.
If it’s equatorial diameter is larger than its polar radius, it’s an oblate spheroid. If the polar radius is larger, it’s a prolate spheriod – AKA an egg. There’s a difference. Only an oblate spheriod can be due to spinning, as it stretches the sphere equally in two dimensions (say, x & y) relative to the other axial dimension.
…and me with a math degree no less. Let’s eat!
Wow, I knew Regulus was the brightest star around, but not about a bulge in its surface! Now Regulus is even cooler! But I wish it WOULD rotate faster and explode already…Haven’t seen a supernova in some time, you know…heh heh heh…
I am through waiting. If Regulus wants my attention, then it will go on and explode. Sometimes the greatest fame comes in death…heh heh heh…