Sorrell says Australia is ideally placed to take advantage of the enormous potential of this new technology: “We have abundant sunlight, huge reserves of titanium and we’re close to the burgeoning energy markets of the Asia-Pacific region. But this technology could be used anywhere in the world. It’s been the dream of many people for a long time to develop it and it’s exciting to know that it is now within such close reach.”
The results of the team’s work will be presented this week at an international conference.
Eminent delegates from Japan, Germany, the United States and Australia will be in Sydney on August 27 for a one-day International Conference on Materials for Hydrogen Energy at UNSW.
Among them will be the inventors of the solar hydrogen process, Professors Akira Fujishima and Kenichi Honda. Both are frontrunners for the Nobel Prize in chemistry and are the laureates of the 2004 Japan Prize.
Since their 1971 discovery that allowed the splitting of water into hydrogen and oxygen, researchers have made huge advances in achieving one of the ultimate goals of science and technology – the design of materials required to split water using solar light.
The UNSW team opted to use titania ceramic photoelectrodes because they have the right semiconducting properties and the highest resistance to water corrosion.
Professors Nowotny and Sorrell say that with appropriate government support and financial backing, their technology could help Australia become part an OPEC of the future.
‘”We have a solar energy empire in Australia and have a moral obligation to utilise this,” says Nowotny. “The very same sentiments were shared by David Sukuzi when he visited Sydney recently. He said he hoped Australia would serve as an example to the rest of the world.”
Solar hydrogen, Professor Sorrell argues, is not incompatible with coal. It can be used to produce solar methanol, which produces less carbon dioxide than conventional methods. “As a mid-term energy carrier it has a lot to say for it,” he says.
At present, the UNSW work is backed by Rio Tinto, Sialon Ceramics and Austral Bricks A major producer of titania slag, Rio Tinto hopes that an early outcome will be a more environmentally friendly and economically attractive local source of fuel for its remote mining operations while Sialon Ceramics is interesting in production and marketing of a solar-hydrogen production device.
… as is obvious if you read through the posts at this site”. Note the comments on what is considered a commercially viable efficiency and the one reprinting an earlier article with the same authors two years ago. Note especially: Typical cost of solar H2 in a sunny location (320+daysx8 h/year) is $40/GJ, compared to $1/GJ for “reformed methane” and $0.50 for liquid fuels. The Hydrogen Economy is still largely a fantasy.
Millions of tonnes per year are made,
tens of thousands of tonnes are liquefied
and bought and sold. (If not liquefied,
hydrogen tends to be immediately used
by the same outfit that makes it.)
There have been prototype hydrogen cars
for 25-plus years, some much better than the ones in the news recently. Where are
the early adopters?
Certainly Ah-nold isn’t going to be one.
— Graham Cowan
Boron: A Better Energy Carrier than Hydrogen?