“It could even make the Dick Tracy wrist radio with all the features, such as Internet access, a possibility,” Vincent says.
The inventor pursued his quest to build a better antenna in earnest eight years ago when he and his significant other moved into a house situated on a 50-foot by 100-foot lot in Warwick. There was nothing on the commercial market that could fit the lot that would provide the performance Vincent needed to be heard in distant lands and that would be acceptable to his neighbors. All the small antennas being sold were inefficient and lacked bandwidth, which resulted in low performance and high frustration.
Vincent looked at the techniques that were currently used to reduce antenna size and realized something was missing in the way everyone was approaching the problem.
He began to model various combinations into a computer program called MathCad. His first attempt produced a 21 MHz band antenna that was 18 inches high. Normally, antennas for this band are 12 to 24 feet high.
Vincent installed the antenna in his back yard. The legal limit that amateurs can operate is 1,000 watts with the norm being 100 watts. The amateur radio operator experimented with 5 to 10 watts. He reached a station in Chile and made contacts in various European countries. Meanwhile he kept adding power until it reached 100 watts. That’s when things suddenly went bad. Walking outside in the backyard, he understood why. The antenna had melted.
After examining the molten matter, Vincent wasn’t discouraged. This was only a small model and not designed to handle much power. The part of the antenna that failed proved to be the key to the design. After analyzing the failure, Vincent realized that he was able to transform a lot of current along the antenna with even relatively low power.
“Antennas radiate by setting up large amounts of current flow through various parts of their structure,” he says. “The larger the current the more radiation and the better the output of the antenna.”
Vincent went back to the drawing board and continued to improve the technology. Relying on his nearly 30 years at Raytheon Co. and at KVH Industries in Middletown R.I., which provided him with a diversified background in electronics and electronic systems, Vincent overcame a myriad of problems and succeeded.
He established three test sites for various prototypes. Antennas were placed in Westport, Mass. in a salt marsh, the best ground for transmission and reception. Another set of antennas was placed on rocky ground in Cumberland, R.I., the worst kind of site, and at a Warwick site which is in between the two in terms of grounding. The antennas, which resemble flagpoles, worked well at all locations.
Tests confirmed that Vincent has created antennas at one third to one ninth of their full size counterparts. Normally smaller antennas are only 8 to 15 percent efficient. Vincent’s antennas achieved 80 to 100 percent efficiency as compared to the larger antennas.
A patent is pending on Vincent’s technology. The inventor has made the University of Rhode Island and its Physics Department partners that will benefit from any revenue his invention earns. “The University and its Physics Department has been very supportive and given me time and space to work on this project,” says Vincent who was recently presented the 2004 Outstanding Intellectual Property Award by URI’s Research Office. “I couldn’t have done this without the University’s support. It’s only fair that it share in the profits.”
is being bandied around by the ham operators. Some of them are misreading the news release. One thought the melting was a sign of a flaw, to which I reply, yeah, that’s why he had to change the design. Another thought the claim of 80-100% efficiency was a tip-off, apparently not noticing that that was relative to larger designs, not an overall efficiency (80% implies that it is less efficient than a larger one- the benefits come from the reduction in size). The guy might be wrong, be we won’t know until someone else tests it.
Can you think of a worse market for something that doesn’t work than the communications field? If there is any problem with this technology, outsiders who test it will quickly report it…after six people stand around tinkering with it to make sure it’s installed right.
A search
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&u=%2Fnetahtml%2Fsearch-adv.htm&r=0&f=S&l=50&d=PTXT&RS=%28%28monopole+AND+antenna%29+AND+distributed%29&Refine=Refine+Search&Refine=Refine+Search&Query=monopole+AND+antenna+AND+distributed-load
shows there ain’t no patent, yet.
In the future, please use <A HREF> tags instead of just posting a link that ridiculously long as plain text. It deforms the view of the webpage and puts much of the article off-screen for people, requiring us to scroll left & right continuously to read it.
Can a site admin fix this link or make it so that it doesn’t affect the formatting of the above article?