In order to simulate ice-age conditions, the scientists added iron to surface waters in two patches, each 15 kilometers on a side, so that the concentration of this micronutrient reached about 50 parts per trillion – a 100-fold increase over ambient concentrations. Even at this low concentration, massive blooms of phytoplankton occurred at both locations. These blooms covered thousands of square kilometers, and were visible in satellite images of the area.
Each of these blooms consumed over 30,000 tons of carbon dioxide. Of particular interest to the scientists was whether this carbon dioxide would be returned to the atmosphere, or would sink into deep waters as the phytoplankton died or were consumed by grazing marine organisms.
Certain plants, like diatoms, are heavy and sink to the deep ocean. “If they are eaten, or decomposed by bacteria, and if that occurs at depth, then the carbon dioxide is retained in the deep sea where it is sequestered for at least 1,000 or more years,” said Brzezinski.
Some of the findings from the study suggest that, when extrapolated over large regions, iron fertilization could cause billions of tons of carbon to be removed from the atmosphere each year. Removal of this much carbon dioxide from the atmosphere could have helped cool the Earth during ice ages.
Similarly, some people have proposed that a massive iron fertilization program could help mitigate the current trend toward global warming. Brzezinski, however, does not hold out much hope for the prevention of global warming through fertilization of the ocean. He said that his measurements did not show a strong enough result to expect that fertilization could reverse global warming. “It’s still an open question as to whether or not this is a viable way to export carbon to the deep sea,” he said.
Brzezinski is particularly interested in the availability of silicon to phytoplankton, another limiting factor like iron. The southern part of the Southern Ocean has plenty of silicon, and the northern part has low levels. Diatoms, for example, need silicon. They are heavy and sink rapidly to the deep ocean when fertilized with iron. Brzezinski’s studies showed that the lack of silicon in the northern part of the Southern Ocean severely restricted the growth of diatoms after iron was added.
Yet there are other forms of phytoplankton that do not require silicon for growth. These forms bloomed in the northern region, still consuming vast amounts of carbon dioxide. This finding has doubled the area of the Southern Ocean that scientists believe could be important for carbon cycling.
The study was headed by Kenneth Coale of Moss Landing Marine Laboratories and Ken Johnson of Monterey Bay Aquarium.
I was glad to read that Brzezinski didn’t immediately jump on board with whoever proposed that we use this technique to slow or reverse global warming. I think the people asking him this question haven’t thought things through and proposing that we use this technique is very short-sighted of them. For all we know, the plankton blooming would reach epic proportions on its own, after inital seeding by us, and by sheer weight it would smother all other ocean life.
There is no telling right now what the consequences of such an action would be. Many years of research would be needed to study what effects seeding the ocean with iron to trigger plankton blooming would be before this should even be considered.