That was a notable and interesting achievement, Batelaan said, but it only confirmed results published in 2001 by teams of scientists at Harvard University and the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, both in Cambridge, Mass. “We’re happy that we at least are up to par with the people at Harvard, but Gao did something more,” Batelaan said. “He changed the parameters and found out he could do something with it that actually might mean something.”
Gao demonstrated that polarized light could be harnessed to create quantum memory.
The ability to store quantum information is a critical element in the quest to create quantum computers, devices that would vastly outstrip in power and speed any computer now in existence. In present-day computers, memory is stored as millions of zeros and ones on silicon chips. But the point of a quantum computer is to take advantage of how the laws of physics change at the atomic, or quantum, level, where it’s possible to exist in more than one state simultaneously.
Something other than static ones and zeros on silicon chips, then, will be necessary for memory storage.
“If you have light going a certain way, you have an electric field that oscillates,” Batelaan said. “It can oscillate horizontally or it can oscillate vertically. Those are the zeroes and ones of your qubit in this case.
“But the problem is, suppose I want to make a quantum computer out of light. I need to do something with the light, but the light goes by so quickly that I can’t do anything with it. So it would be nice to take that light and dump it into something so that we can actually do something with it.”
Batelaan, Gao and their research team (which included research assistant professor Mark Rosenberry and undergraduate student Ben Williams of Yankton, S.D.) “dumped” the light into the rubidium tube, and they found they were indeed able to do something with it. They created a quantum memory.
“The scientists at Harvard looked at one polarization only, and what Gao is capable of doing is not only two polarizations, but all combinations,” Batelaan said. “The fidelity for all polarizations is better than 95 percent, so it’s darn good. It shows that the polarization state is well-maintained during storage in the rubidium cell. He clinched this issue that you can use polarized light as a qubit, as a one-qubit quantum memory.”
A standard, run-of-the-mill desktop computer typically has more than 100 million bits of memory, however, and Batelaan readily acknowledges that there is a long way to go in the quest for a functional quantum computer.
“How many bits do you have in a typical computer memory? A boatload. How many do we have on our table? One,” he said. “But the difference between zero and one is often enormous and the obvious thing that we’re discussing is how do we make more.
“It’s anybody’s guess what the future components of quantum computers are going to be. But if you ask my guess, light is definitely going to play a role, and some medium that can store the information, some material like rubidium that can talk to the light, is going to play a role. The process of how light talks to matter, that’s what we’re studying.”
Gao, Rosenberry and Batelaan published their research in the May issue of Physical Review A, the journal of atomic, molecular and optical physics. Their research was supported by a Nebraska Research Initiative grant.
Assuming that there were underground bunkers in Nebraska, you wouldn’t have to worry about exposing them and getting in trouble. In America, if someone in the press exposes information that is supposed to be kept secret, they cannot be prosecuted post-facto. The idea is that the government should not be able to take people out for saying something that government claims is dangerous afterwards. That could allow for major abuses effectively killing free speech. However, they are allowed to attempt to prevent information from leaking before it does (as the Bush admistration is trying to do). But since (I hope) you were never told that there is a secret bunker in Nebraska, you could not be punished for saying something that no one told you is top-secret.
I think I learned this in a high school government class. So forgive me if I am in anyway wrong but am quite confident that I have the gist of it correct. So rickyjames, sleep peacefully tonight. :)
No problem.
The observer of a quantum bunker cannot know both the location and velocity, so when you identify its location you cause it to move elsewhere.